Electronics

Filters Reference

Filter responses compared — Butterworth, Chebyshev, Bessel, elliptic — and topology choices.

Responses

ResponsePassband rippleStopbandPhase / group delayUse
ButterworthNone (maximally flat)Slow roll-offModerateGeneral — smooth magnitude
Chebyshev IRipplesFaster roll-offWorse than ButterWhen sharp cut beats flatness
Chebyshev IINoneRipples in stopSimilarAlternative Chebyshev
Elliptic (Cauer)RipplesRipplesWorstSharpest transition per order
BesselNoneSlowest roll-offBest (flat delay)Audio, pulse — preserves shape
GaussianNoneSoftNo overshootMatched filters

Topologies

TopologyNotes
Passive RC / RLCSimple, lossy, poor selectivity
Active (op-amp) Sallen-KeyCommon 2nd-order; low output Z
Multiple Feedback (MFB)Inverting topology; easy to cascade
State-variableThree outputs (LP, BP, HP) from one circuit
BiquadSecond-order building block; used for equalizers
Switched-capacitorTunable via clock; good for integrated
FIR digitalLinear phase, stable, straightforward
IIR digitalEfficient, can reach analog-like response

Order vs roll-off

First-order−20 dB/decade (−6 dB/octave)
Second-order−40 dB/decade
n-th order−20·n dB/decade

Notes

  • For audio crossovers, match order between high-pass and low-pass. For anti-aliasing, Butterworth or Bessel preferred (no passband ripple).
  • Digital filters are often specified by normalized cutoff (0.5 = Nyquist).
Was this article helpful?