Filters Reference

Filter responses compared — Butterworth, Chebyshev, Bessel, elliptic — and topology choices.

Reference Reference Updated Apr 19, 2026
Reference

Responses

Response Passband ripple Stopband Phase / group delay Use
Butterworth None (maximally flat) Slow roll-off Moderate General — smooth magnitude
Chebyshev I Ripples Faster roll-off Worse than Butter When sharp cut beats flatness
Chebyshev II None Ripples in stop Similar Alternative Chebyshev
Elliptic (Cauer) Ripples Ripples Worst Sharpest transition per order
Bessel None Slowest roll-off Best (flat delay) Audio, pulse — preserves shape
Gaussian None Soft No overshoot Matched filters

Topologies

Topology Notes
Passive RC / RLC Simple, lossy, poor selectivity
Active (op-amp) Sallen-Key Common 2nd-order; low output Z
Multiple Feedback (MFB) Inverting topology; easy to cascade
State-variable Three outputs (LP, BP, HP) from one circuit
Biquad Second-order building block; used for equalizers
Switched-capacitor Tunable via clock; good for integrated
FIR digital Linear phase, stable, straightforward
IIR digital Efficient, can reach analog-like response

Order vs roll-off

First-order
−20 dB/decade (−6 dB/octave)
Second-order
−40 dB/decade
n-th order
−20·n dB/decade

Notes

  • For audio crossovers, match order between high-pass and low-pass. For anti-aliasing, Butterworth or Bessel preferred (no passband ripple).
  • Digital filters are often specified by normalized cutoff (0.5 = Nyquist).

Last updated: